The nation of Australia was long seen as a international standard-bearer in gun control – the Bondi tragedy has exposed a more complicated reality.

On a spring day in the year 1996, a solitary shooter wielding semi-automatic rifles murdered 35 people in the Australian tourist town of Port Arthur.

That horrific event nearly three decades ago, which sparked some of the toughest firearm regulations in the world, can seem like a different era for many residents.

However, the shooting at Bondi this past Sunday, which left 15 dead, has brought back painful recollections of the Tasmanian tragedy.

Firearm Possession at a Historic Peak

A study released earlier this year revealed that there are now over four million guns in private hands across the country – a figure that is almost double the amount from two decades prior.

This means approximately a weapon for each small group of people.

While Queensland has the highest number of legal firearms, followed by NSW and the state of Victoria, it is Tasmania and the NT that have the greatest density of weapons.

The data also challenges the common view that guns are mainly owned by those in the countryside.

Weapons are prevalent in cities and their outskirts, with a large share located in major cities.

Critically, there are now more guns in fewer hands, with the typical gun owner possessing over four firearms.

Examining Australia's Existing Weapons Policies?

Weapons legislation in Australia are not uniform across the country, with a patchwork implementation of rules between different jurisdictions.

Broadly speaking, to apply for a gun licence, an individual must be over 18, deemed a "fit and proper person", pass a competency test, and provide a "legitimate need" for ownership.

The allowable purposes include recreational hunting or pest control, competitive shooting, certain job-related needs, and collecting.

However, significant shortcomings remain. For instance, young people in some jurisdictions can have supervision of a firearm from as young as pre-teen age.

Following the Port Arthur massacre, a major rewrite of national gun laws was enacted, leading to a voluntary hand-in of over 650,000 firearms.

Rapid-fire weapons were banned, and background checks alongside delays for sales were introduced.

A key tenet of these reforms was the elimination of "self-defence" as a valid reason for gun ownership.

Renewed Demands for Firearm Policy Changes

In the immediate aftermath the Bondi shooting, political leaders were forceful about the need to bolster gun laws.

A national gun buyback scheme was proposed, marking the largest such effort since 1996.

Other planned reforms now under consideration include:

  • Restricting the number of guns an individual can possess.
  • Addressing "open-ended" licensing arrangements.
  • Making Australian citizenship a condition for firearm ownership.
  • Improving intelligence sharing during background check processes.

There are also calls for periodic reassessments of existing licence holders, acknowledging that "individuals can be radicalised" over time.

A Complicated Debate

These swift actions have drawn criticism from some quarters.

Pro-gun advocates contend that limiting gun numbers would not have prevented an attack driven by extremist ideology.

They suggest that focus would be better spent improving intelligence rather than restricting lawful owners for the vast majority of licensed individuals.

Furthermore, a critical reform from 1996 – a national firearms register – remains unfinished, though it has now been listed as a key project.

A Painful Reminder

For long-time advocates, the Bondi attack is a stark warning that regulations must be updated with technological advances.

They argue that reform is needed to "address deficiencies" and protect public safety.

While mass shootings remain uncommon in Australia compared to some nations, the threat persists, and the legacy of firearms circulating illegally – through black markets – continues to pose a challenge.

As one advocate stated, "It is unfortunate that it requires such a devastating event to focus attention and take notice."

Calvin Harmon
Calvin Harmon

A tech journalist and AI researcher passionate about demystifying complex technologies for a broader audience.